Test01 Download
Test02 Download
Try now.
Both are problemartic, but the second (teste2.zip) has
some problem with an loop instruction, and also contains several push to
wrong data pr code (I mean, the pointers are not being dislayed)...they are
pudh 24564, when they should be push Code24564, or push Data24564
I´m using boith files, because i´m tryiong to build a
pe header viewer that will display all the infromatinos about the header.
Ag night i send to you the file, to you take a look.
(Or i i´ll post the probelm on he board. (I guess, i already did something
similar);
New testing
from
Hi René, I posted thios on the email I sent to you
last night. here goes the final test i did.
I did n´t post there because Randal may use it as
a reason to attack.
I did with this type of file to check the
behaviour i have at my office. The results wer the same.
RosAsm compile it in 800 ms, while msm take about 500.
The main problem is the parsing time..It is taking
much time to be perfoemed. For example, when i use n version with macros, the
diferences between the parsing time, from an app that was disassembled and
another that is not, may reach 10x in some cases.
Also tehre is a variance on the timings...Assemble the
file NoSpaces.exe, then...keep pressing Compile button to you see the results.
If you press 10 times....the 10 will be different (The
difference is not that big....but it seems to be more significative in the
parsing time) If the difference is always (or mostly) at the parsing time, that
means that RosAsm is perfoming different checks to compile the same file every
time you press the compile button..
Since, it is the same file, same sources,
etc...nothing is changed..there should not be any reason for the parsing time
be different, and RosAsm perform different checks for this.
The compile time per se...is always good....but the
parsing time is the most that is variying and taking so long to execute.
Best Regards,
Guga
Hi René
here goes the file Grid.exe…It also contains the source.